The Dark Knight Rises fails to meet expectations but sweeps me off the floor, all the same.

I had begun the preparation early on to have the best experience for TDKR. I had watched the 13 minute featurette, listened to most of Zimmer's OST, and even read a bad review or two just to keep my hopes down - but it's Nolan's film, it's hard to keep your hopes down, so I failed at it anyway. And then when I heard the news about the Denver shooting, I was quite turned off. For about 2 hours, I think I did nothing, sitting in my office, just thinking - and didn't even felt like going to the movie later in the day. It was a frightful shock and am not sure how much I've recovered from it.

But I made it to movie, trying to flush my mind of everything that's unfair and unreasonable out there, getting in on time, with the trailers of 'Man of Steel' and 'The Hobbit', building the excitement. I can remember quite clearly, the moments in the movie when I almost jumped out of my seat, and wanted to clap so hard or shake a fist in the air, or just yell, "Hell yeah." The movie was stuffed with those "cool" scenes, the scenes that are perhaps the flesh of superhero movies. But what the movie sacrificed in giving preference for these uber cool scenes was it's blood - it's theme. Yes, true, I liked the finale, it was a decent ending to the movie itself and to the trilogy as well. But in parts, I could make out that the story is stretched and you can tell easily too, when a story is "made up" after a brilliantly written earlier story (TDK) just to make an installment or next version. So it's a hard job, I don't blame Nolan or underrate his genius, but also I would definitely not consider TDKR to be regarded as much as his other works like Inception, Prestige, TDK and so on.

Another major issue is the story arc itself. It wasn't quite perfect, with the end being predictable, and not as uplifting as were the ends of Nolan's some other famous works. If a story has to leave an impression on the reader, the end must be quite unpredictable - but when it occurs, it shouldn't look strange - it should look justified. You should be able to say, "Oh! But, of course! How did I miss that - the entire story was building up for this climax - I just missed the clues - ahh now I can see the beauty and the way it fits together..."


And then the character of Miranda Tate girl wasn't at all fleshed out, Bane - uh Bane - I did not get any of his dialogue (perhaps that's just my problem), and the subtitles in a strange European language did not help at all. And then I guess, for me, it's all about the integrity thing which the movie lacks, if only every character would stay true to himself/herself - the entire story might have worked out quite well. And in that sense, the young cop - Joseph Gordon, was the only one who got lucky with a solid characterization. But the rest of them, even Bruce Wayne/Batman, faltered at some points. I think things would always be much better, if all characters stopped trying to be a smart ass in front of the camera. (Same prob. with HP7 - but by no means, HP7 or the likes of Avengers stand any close to TDKR when it comes to pure spectacle)

But again, who am I, to pick on these details, not every single work of a great artist is equal in impact or magnitude. And instead of all those minor flaws, TDKR did sweep me off my feet. And if I couldn't earn much food for after-thought from the movie as I usually expect to do from any brilliant artwork, I did learn the lesson this trilogy had always been giving us: Get rid of your fear. If the motive of the shooter in the US was to inflict terror, we must not fear - it's the least we can do. Be cautious in life, but not afraid of anything, never. Only by fighting our strongest fears, we can Rise.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Book: "For The Love of Physics" by Walter Lewin 
Current Music: "Rumour has it" by Adele
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------People who read this post also liked :


7 comments:

RAHUL MIGLANI said...

And I wanted my Money back

Tanya said...

^^lol...

Neel Tripathi said...

Nolan wrote a script based on Joker's return but after Heath Ledger's death, he has to abandon that story and create something totally new and most importantly in sync with TDK.

And one more thing, Bane's character could not be justified without Joker(read the comics).

And the part that you didn't get any of Bane's dialogue, well yes it's totally your fault. :|

Tanya said...

^^I thought you would make a better case for your argument, apparently being a hardcore fan. But your comment seems more like an emotional quick burst that didn't really made any point or implied clearly what you mean to say. So I wouldn't say more than what I just said.

Neel Tripathi said...

Ah! But I did not try to present a solid case for an arguement, I just laid out the facts.

If you will read the comics, you will know how much joker is essential for the making of Bane. And after what Heath ledger has done(the acting part) I don't think even you would try to bring someone else as joker!

And I am not a fan of batman, I like him more thabn any other superheroes since he does't have any super powers!(only super technologis). :D

Tanya said...

^^

...

Yeah right. I love batman too.

OMFGITSROHIT said...

Haha dude, those are personal issues you had with the film, not flaws. Hehe, nice read though.

Post a Comment

The Thought Pad Headline Animator

There was an error in this gadget
There was an error in this gadget

Hottest Posts

Make your own

About Me

My photo
My little body is aweary of this great world. An Indian PhD student horsing around in Europe.

Track me by Email-Shemail

Subscribe Some Shit

Followers

Socialize?

FeedCount

There was an error in this gadget